Subscribe from £5 every three months.

Latest Articles

Why do we need to save the nation’s clubs?

Over the last 18 months, Stir to Action’s Centre for Democratic Business has been working with a range of organisations and individuals who are concerned about, or part of, revitalising the future of Britain’s social clubs. 

Though the number of clubs and total membership has collapsed over the last generation from its peak of 4,000 clubs and four million members in the 1970s, there are still around 1,800 clubs in Britain, providing space for community connection through sports and recreation, culture and the arts, and vital local services.  

These social clubs embody the history of working people’s struggle to decide for themselves how they want to associate, socialise, organise, and build community, often in the face of suspicious authorities or paternalistic reformers. As non-transactional spaces where members can govern their own spaces outside of the public or private sector, they are more relevant than ever.

Today, the nation’s clubs present a mixed picture. Many have closed their doors, while others are underused, or converting to new uses and ownership. Some survive mainly by leasing space to other groups, serving as community assets beyond their use by members. In many cases, there is social conflict over their futures, and, more rarely, there are examples of revitalisation. 

Within the context of a weak civil society – particularly the alarming decline of the nation’s social infrastructure – we asked MPs, civil society groups, trade unions, community organisers, and legal professionals about why we need to save and revitalise social clubs.

Unlocking space: From meanwhile use to community ownership

Bex Trevalyan with Juliet Can & Kathryn Chiswell Jones & Andy Edwards

A conversation between Juliet Can, Stour Trust; Kathryn Chiswell Jones, Artspace Lifespace; Andy Edwards, Makespace Oxford with Bex Trevalyan, Platform Places, brought to you from the ABCs of the New Economy Festival 2024 held last summer at Ashton Court in Bristol.

Read More...Read More...

Re-organising the Business School

Matt Wilson

Re-organise is a project aimed at promoting alternative economic and organisational perspectives in higher education, and particularly (for now) its business schools. In the following article, I explain how the project uses ideas of cultural reproduction and performativity to make a bigger impact than our limited resources might otherwise allow.  

Read More...Read More...

Interview: The Lie of the Land

An interview with environmental campaigner and author Guy Shrubsole

JGF: Your new book – The Lie of the Land: Who Really Cares for the Countryside? – continues to question the inequalities of land ownership, which follows on from 2019’s Who Owns England? revealing the devastating statistic that “less than 1% of the population own roughly half of the land in the UK.”

Over time, and under pressure to justify such high levels of private ownership in the UK, landowners have presented themselves as ‘custodians’ and ‘guardians’ who can be trusted to act as ‘good stewards’ without the need to introduce any regulations or interfere with ownership. Can you retrace the historical narrative of ‘stewardship’ back to its roots and explain its current – if fading – power?

GS: A lot of people will hear the word ‘stewardship’ or ‘custodianship’ and think that it sounds like a good idea – to not own something outright, but look after it on behalf of someone else. The etymology of ‘steward’ goes back to the Old English stīweard, meaning the ward or guardian of the household or animals – stig gives us the word (pig) ‘sty’ – on behalf of the lord of the manor. What that essentially conveys is that it’s someone looking after something on behalf of someone else, so it has that sense of only being here temporarily – trying to care for the land, to pass it on in a good state. I do think this is a noble ideal but it's also become the vogue as a narrative frame used by landowners, lobbyists, and business groups as a way of essentially defending the status quo and shielding bad environmental practices from too much scrutiny, and evading government regulations. 

In the book, I trace this history back to its origins, but what I also found fascinating was uncovering how the language of stewardship was deliberately revived in the 1970s by groups like the Country Land and Business Association (CLA) and the National Farmers Union (NFU), and how successive NFU presidents have used the phrase ‘custodians of the countryside’ from the 1970s through to today. It's basically a right of passage for NFU presidents to keep parroting this phrase. And it's a phrase that's been picked up by politicians as well. Every time they go to the Oxford Farming Conference, the NFU conference, or CLA conference, they make some reference to landowners being the ‘stewards of the land’, and farmers the ‘custodians of the countryside’. And often, at least under the Conservatives, it was accompanied by a promise not to add to the regulatory burdens of farmers or landowners, but to carry on providing billions of pounds of public money in farm subsidies each year. So essentially, it's a way of deflecting attention away from the degree to which landowners and farmers have control over what they're doing, and hold considerable sway over what they do on the land. And too often it’s prioritising profit, personal gain, and private property rights over protection. Ultimately, the reason for it is to say, 'We want to have our private property rights unaffected by wider public, social and environmental issues’. I’m of the view that private property rights have always been to a certain extent compromised; there has to be a trade-off between the rights of private property owners and the wider common good. But obviously the lobby groups and the big landowners will push forcefully for those constraints to be minimised.

People reading my book may think, ‘I know a nature-friendly farmer’, or ‘I know a landowner who is as good a steward as they can be’. And I cite examples of people like that in the book as well – such as James Rebanks in Cumbria, and Charlie Burrell and Isabella Tree rewilding the Knepp estate in Sussex. But again it comes back to the idea that individual actors are going to save us, and that we can put our faith in those heroes, rather than in systemic change. In some ways this has been encouraged by the rewilding movement because the way it's been brought into practice in England at least has very much focused on individual landowners doing heroic things on their own land. In Scotland it’s obviously quite a different narrative, with a challenge to ‘green lairds’, for example, and there has been a big debate about land reform, what land is for, and community land ownership in Scotland, over the last 20 years or so.

Read More...Read More...

Philanthropy, Power, and Systems Change

This is the first in a series of conversations between Stir to Action and representatives from philanthropic foundations about their role in democratising wealth in the UK. Stir to Action’s Daniel Stanley speaks to Emma Shaw, who works with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Emerging Futures team.

Read More...Read More...

All Articles

SUBSCRIBE TO

THE MAGAZINE FOR
THE NEW ECONOMY

Subscriptions

From economics to politics, we're the leading magazine of democratic alternatives

We feature in-depth articles, long-form interviews, and editorials that present a serious challenge to the current economic and political crisis.

Subscribe to access four new digital issues per year via Exact Editions, and full access to the complete digital archive of STIR Magazine. All subscriptions (except the ‘digital only’) include the STIR annual – a printed collection of the best of STIR Magazine from the year.

Access the Archive

We have hundreds of original articles, interviews, reviews, and practical toolkits in our archive… now in your pocket

We have hundreds of original articles, interviews, reviews, and practical toolkits in our archive from over ten years of publishing STIR magazine. Subscribers have access to the archive as part of an annual subscription.

For online-only access to the STIR archive, you can purchase a digital subscription for £11.99 a year.

Get a digital subscription

Preview of Current Issue

Print Shop

Spring 2025 #49

Winter 2025 #48

Autumn 2024 #47

Summer 2024 #46

All Issues

FAQs

Can I purchase a gift subscription?
Yes! We offer one-year or three-year subscriptions. Simply subscribe using the buttons above and enter the name and mailing address of the subscriber.

Can I subscribe as an institution or organisation?
Yes! Digital Institutional subscriptions are available for academic, corporate, and government institutions via Exact Editions, featuring:

When will I receive my copy of the STIR annual?
The first edition of the STIR annual will be published and delivered in December 2025.

How can I access the digital archive?
If you are an existing subscriber, you can login to Exact Editions here. If you are a new subscriber, please contact distribution@stirtoaction.com to receive your login information after completing your purchase.

How can I update my subscription details?
Most subscribers should be able to update delivery and contact details by logging in to your Stripe account. Check your confirmation email for a link.

How can I cancel my subscription?
Most subscribers should be able to cancel your subscription by logging in to your Stripe account. If you encounter any issues, or if you subscribed before 2023, please email distribution@stirtoaction.com. You will also need to cancel recurring payments via your bank.

Read Our Blog

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.